Nash v. P.S.U
Nash v. P.S.U is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/21/2008 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 01/22/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Garr M. King · 1,203 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:08-cv-01243
- Nature of suit
- 385 Property damage - Product liability
Property damage caused by an allegedly defective product. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/21/2008
- Date terminated
- 01/22/2009
1,132 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Nash v. P.S.U?
Nash v. P.S.U is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/21/2008 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 01/22/2009. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:08-cv-01243.
When was the case filed?
Nash v. P.S.U was filed on 10/21/2008. It was terminated on 01/22/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12421390 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:08-cv-01243 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).