NexLAN LLC v. Hiser
NexLAN LLC v. Hiser is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/29/2009 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 06/26/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, C.D. Illinois (C.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harold A. Baker · 1,892 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:09-cv-02127
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/29/2009
- Date terminated
- 06/26/2009
264 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · NexLAN LLC
- defendant · Hiser · 25 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is NexLAN LLC v. Hiser?
NexLAN LLC v. Hiser is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/29/2009 in the District Court, C.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 06/26/2009. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, C.D. Illinois, docket number 2:09-cv-02127.
When was the case filed?
NexLAN LLC v. Hiser was filed on 05/29/2009. It was terminated on 06/26/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12403482 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:09-cv-02127 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).