Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Patent Lawsuit

Oakley Inc v. Kristic

Patent Terminated 06/25/1990 District Court, D. Hawaii

Oakley Inc v. Kristic is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/31/1990 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 06/25/1990.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
01/31/1990
Date terminated
06/25/1990

73 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Oakley Inc v. Kristic?

Oakley Inc v. Kristic is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/31/1990 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 06/25/1990. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii.

When was the case filed?

Oakley Inc v. Kristic was filed on 01/31/1990. It was terminated on 06/25/1990.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Patent Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9076310 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).