Ocs v. Attig
Ocs v. Attig is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/28/2002 in the District Court, D. Vermont. The case was terminated on 12/12/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Vermont (D. Vt.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Garvan Murtha · 1,219 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:02-cv-00284
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 10/28/2002
- Date terminated
- 12/12/2002
227 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ocs v. Attig?
Ocs v. Attig is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/28/2002 in the District Court, D. Vermont. The case was terminated on 12/12/2002. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Vermont, docket number 1:02-cv-00284.
When was the case filed?
Ocs v. Attig was filed on 10/28/2002. It was terminated on 12/12/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11544183 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:02-cv-00284 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).