Offen v. Carroll
Offen v. Carroll is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/18/1997 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 11/10/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stephen M McNamee · 2,315 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:97-cv-01509
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 07/18/1997
- Date terminated
- 11/10/1997
1,229 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Offen v. Carroll?
Offen v. Carroll is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 07/18/1997 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 11/10/1997. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:97-cv-01509.
When was the case filed?
Offen v. Carroll was filed on 07/18/1997. It was terminated on 11/10/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10638488 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:97-cv-01509 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).