Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuit

Oppenheim v. Friedman

Personal Property / Fraud Terminated 08/31/2009 District Court, S.D. New York

Oppenheim v. Friedman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/14/2005 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 08/31/2009.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category.
Jurisdiction
Diversity of citizenship
Date filed
02/14/2005
Date terminated
08/31/2009

6,326 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits

These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Oppenheim v. Friedman?

Oppenheim v. Friedman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/14/2005 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 08/31/2009. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York.

When was the case filed?

Oppenheim v. Friedman was filed on 02/14/2005. It was terminated on 08/31/2009.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14197798 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).