Osman v. Koskinen
Osman v. Koskinen is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/16/2017 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 04/16/2018.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Patrick J. Schiltz · 3,358 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:17-cv-01619
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/16/2017
- Date terminated
- 04/16/2018
2,109 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Osman v. Koskinen?
Osman v. Koskinen is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/16/2017 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 04/16/2018. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:17-cv-01619.
When was the case filed?
Osman v. Koskinen was filed on 05/16/2017. It was terminated on 04/16/2018.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13545101 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:17-cv-01619 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).