Osorio v. Pon
Osorio v. Pon is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 06/21/2018 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/08/2018.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Ronnie Abrams · 1,932 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:18-cv-05637
- Cause
- 28:1331 Fed. Question
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 790 Labor: Other
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- U.S. Government Defendant
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 06/21/2018
- Date terminated
- 11/08/2018
33,230 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Osorio v. Pon?
Osorio v. Pon is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 06/21/2018 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/08/2018. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:18-cv-05637.
When was the case filed?
Osorio v. Pon was filed on 06/21/2018. It was terminated on 11/08/2018.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 7251557).