Paddock v. Durga Management LLC

Court

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin (E.D. Wis.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

J P Stadtmueller · 3,113 cases in index

Docket number

2:14-cv-00015

Cause

15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

01/07/2014

Date terminated

09/15/2014

4,034 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Paddock · 46 cases
• defendant · Durga Management LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming Durga Management LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Paddock v. Durga Management LLC?

Paddock v. Durga Management LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 01/07/2014 in the District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. The case was terminated on 09/15/2014. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Wisconsin, docket number 2:14-cv-00015.

When was the case filed?

Paddock v. Durga Management LLC was filed on 01/07/2014. It was terminated on 09/15/2014.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).