Palimine v. Katcher
Palimine v. Katcher is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/19/1993 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 03/31/1994.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Arthur D. Spatt · 6,791 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:93-cv-04736
- Nature of suit
- 110 Insurance
Disputes over an insurance policy — denial of a claim, the scope of coverage, or an insurer's alleged bad-faith handling. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/19/1993
- Date terminated
- 03/31/1994
21,739 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Palimine v. Katcher?
Palimine v. Katcher is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/19/1993 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 03/31/1994. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 9:93-cv-04736.
When was the case filed?
Palimine v. Katcher was filed on 10/19/1993. It was terminated on 03/31/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 9731182).