Parmar v. Cauff
Parmar v. Cauff is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/11/2011 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/10/2011.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Adalberto Jordan · 2,827 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:11-cv-21266
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/11/2011
- Date terminated
- 05/10/2011
4,156 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Parmar v. Cauff?
Parmar v. Cauff is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/11/2011 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 05/10/2011. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 1:11-cv-21266.
When was the case filed?
Parmar v. Cauff was filed on 04/11/2011. It was terminated on 05/10/2011.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12834895 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:11-cv-21266 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).