Paz v. Orama Developing Group Corp

Court

District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Kathleen M. Williams · 3,971 cases in index

Docket number

1:23-cv-23423

Cause

15:0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

09/07/2023

Date terminated

12/14/2023

32,006 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Paz · 164 cases
• defendant · Orama Developing Group Corp

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming ORAMA DEVELOPING GROUP CORP — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Paz v. Orama Developing Group Corp?

Paz v. Orama Developing Group Corp is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 09/07/2023 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 12/14/2023. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 1:23-cv-23423.

When was the case filed?

Paz v. Orama Developing Group Corp was filed on 09/07/2023. It was terminated on 12/14/2023.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).