Pearsaw v. Marand
Pearsaw v. Marand is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/11/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 12/23/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania (W.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 2:88-cv-02256
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/11/1988
- Date terminated
- 12/23/1988
3,026 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pearsaw v. Marand?
Pearsaw v. Marand is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/11/1988 in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 12/23/1988. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:88-cv-02256.
When was the case filed?
Pearsaw v. Marand was filed on 10/11/1988. It was terminated on 12/23/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8785287 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:88-cv-02256 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).