Peek v. Greyhound Lines
Peek v. Greyhound Lines is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/25/1986 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 02/05/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Kentucky (W.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/25/1986
- Date terminated
- 02/05/1988
584 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Peek · 147 cases
- defendant · Greyhound Lines · 50 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Peek v. Greyhound Lines?
Peek v. Greyhound Lines is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/25/1986 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 02/05/1988. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky.
When was the case filed?
Peek v. Greyhound Lines was filed on 11/25/1986. It was terminated on 02/05/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8613499 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).