Perschke v. Edenred Sa
Perschke v. Edenred Sa is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/31/2013 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/10/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Pamela K. Chen · 1,948 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:13-cv-03167
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/31/2013
- Date terminated
- 01/10/2014
3,192 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Perschke · 6 cases
- defendant · Edenred Sa
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Perschke v. Edenred Sa?
Perschke v. Edenred Sa is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 05/31/2013 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 01/10/2014. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 1:13-cv-03167.
When was the case filed?
Perschke v. Edenred Sa was filed on 05/31/2013. It was terminated on 01/10/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13049647 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:13-cv-03167 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).