Pham v. Ellis
Pham v. Ellis is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/13/1996 in the District Court, E.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 04/25/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Virginia (E.D. Va.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Unassigned · 15,088 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:96-cv-00183
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/13/1996
- Date terminated
- 04/25/1996
2,055 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pham v. Ellis?
Pham v. Ellis is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/13/1996 in the District Court, E.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 04/25/1996. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Virginia, docket number 1:96-cv-00183.
When was the case filed?
Pham v. Ellis was filed on 02/13/1996. It was terminated on 04/25/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17571192 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:96-cv-00183 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).