Pharr v. SunTrust Bank
Pharr v. SunTrust Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/05/2013 in the District Court, W.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 06/04/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Tennessee (W.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Daniel Breen · 1,421 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:13-cv-01173
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 06/05/2013
- Date terminated
- 06/04/2014
163 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Pharr · 63 cases
- defendant · SunTrust Bank · 547 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
SunTrust Bank is named in 547 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pharr v. SunTrust Bank?
Pharr v. SunTrust Bank is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/05/2013 in the District Court, W.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 06/04/2014. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Tennessee, docket number 1:13-cv-01173.
When was the case filed?
Pharr v. SunTrust Bank was filed on 06/05/2013. It was terminated on 06/04/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13093252 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:13-cv-01173 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).