Pixton v. Infinger
Pixton v. Infinger is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/05/1994 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 07/05/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George T. Swartz · 46 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:94-cv-00309
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/05/1994
- Date terminated
- 07/05/1996
1,630 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pixton v. Infinger?
Pixton v. Infinger is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/05/1994 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 07/05/1996. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 2:94-cv-00309.
When was the case filed?
Pixton v. Infinger was filed on 10/05/1994. It was terminated on 07/05/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13707014 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:94-cv-00309 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).