Ponder v. Lyng
Ponder v. Lyng is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/03/1989 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 10/18/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Horace W Gilmore · 1,444 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:89-cv-72922
- Nature of suit
- 891 Agricultural acts
Disputes under federal agricultural statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 10/03/1989
- Date terminated
- 10/18/1989
8,347 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ponder v. Lyng?
Ponder v. Lyng is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/03/1989 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 10/18/1989. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:89-cv-72922.
When was the case filed?
Ponder v. Lyng was filed on 10/03/1989. It was terminated on 10/18/1989.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9019200 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:89-cv-72922 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).