Poon v. Vow to Be Chic
Poon v. Vow to Be Chic is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/15/2017 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 12/18/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael H. Simon · 875 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:17-cv-01456
- Cause
- 47:227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act - Nature of suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 09/15/2017
- Date terminated
- 12/18/2017
3,932 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Poon · 18 cases
- defendant · Vow to Be Chic
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Poon v. Vow to Be Chic?
Poon v. Vow to Be Chic is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 09/15/2017 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 12/18/2017. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:17-cv-01456.
When was the case filed?
Poon v. Vow to Be Chic was filed on 09/15/2017. It was terminated on 12/18/2017.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 47 U.S.C. § 227 — Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 6168436 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:17-cv-01456 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).