Potier v. 430 Hibiscus LP
Potier v. 430 Hibiscus LP is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 12/19/2008 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 02/25/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Kenneth L. Ryskamp · 4,802 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:08-cv-81542
- Nature of suit
- 290 Other real property actions
Real-property disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/19/2008
- Date terminated
- 02/25/2009
1,362 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Potier · 12 cases
- defendant · 430 Hibiscus LP
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
430 Hibiscus LP is named in 1 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Potier v. 430 Hibiscus LP?
Potier v. 430 Hibiscus LP is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 12/19/2008 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 02/25/2009. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 9:08-cv-81542.
When was the case filed?
Potier v. 430 Hibiscus LP was filed on 12/19/2008. It was terminated on 02/25/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12435821 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:08-cv-81542 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).