Prisbrey v. Astrue
Prisbrey v. Astrue is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/14/2011 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 09/16/2011.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Clark Waddoups · 1,100 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:11-cv-00055
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/14/2011
- Date terminated
- 09/16/2011
1,135 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Prisbrey v. Astrue?
Prisbrey v. Astrue is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/14/2011 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 09/16/2011. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:11-cv-00055.
When was the case filed?
Prisbrey v. Astrue was filed on 01/14/2011. It was terminated on 09/16/2011.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14304550 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:11-cv-00055 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).