Proctor v. Hull
Proctor v. Hull is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 01/14/2000 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 03/02/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Paul G Rosenblatt · 2,139 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:00-cv-00078
- Nature of suit
- 625 Drug related seizure of property
Government forfeiture of property connected to alleged drug activity. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 01/14/2000
- Date terminated
- 03/02/2000
294 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Proctor v. Hull?
Proctor v. Hull is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 01/14/2000 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 03/02/2000. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:00-cv-00078.
When was the case filed?
Proctor v. Hull was filed on 01/14/2000. It was terminated on 03/02/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17730503 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:00-cv-00078 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).