Proffitt v. Doi
Proffitt v. Doi is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/06/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 04/24/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Kentucky (W.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John G. Heyburn, II · 2,911 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:92-cv-00695
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/06/1992
- Date terminated
- 04/24/1995
1,592 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Proffitt v. Doi?
Proffitt v. Doi is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/06/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 04/24/1995. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky, docket number 3:92-cv-00695.
When was the case filed?
Proffitt v. Doi was filed on 11/06/1992. It was terminated on 04/24/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9980468 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:92-cv-00695 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).