Puckett v. Starkist Co

Court

District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Marco A. Hernandez · 578 cases in index

Docket number

3:17-cv-01416

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

370 Other Fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

09/10/2017

Date terminated

04/11/2018

1,126 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Puckett · 456 cases
• defendant · StarKist Co · 7 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 8 Personal Property / Fraud cases in our index naming StarKist Co — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Warner v. Starkist Co
  District Court, N.D. New YorkFiled 04/04/2018
• Reo v. Starkist Co
  District Court, N.D. OhioFiled 01/22/2016

About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits

These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Puckett v. Starkist Co?

Puckett v. Starkist Co is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/10/2017 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 04/11/2018. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:17-cv-01416.

When was the case filed?

Puckett v. Starkist Co was filed on 09/10/2017. It was terminated on 04/11/2018.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.