Rafaeli v. Bornstein
Rafaeli v. Bornstein is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 04/15/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 05/23/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Sidney H. Stein · 3,460 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:03-cv-02620
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/15/2003
- Date terminated
- 05/23/2003
12,066 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rafaeli v. Bornstein?
Rafaeli v. Bornstein is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 04/15/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 05/23/2003. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:03-cv-02620.
When was the case filed?
Rafaeli v. Bornstein was filed on 04/15/2003. It was terminated on 05/23/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11540391 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:03-cv-02620 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).