Ramage v. Ryan
Ramage v. Ryan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/24/1992 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 11/16/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John M Roll · 661 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:92-cv-00797
- Nature of suit
- 385 Property damage - Product liability
Property damage caused by an allegedly defective product. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 11/24/1992
- Date terminated
- 11/16/1993
1,229 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ramage v. Ryan?
Ramage v. Ryan is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/24/1992 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 11/16/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 4:92-cv-00797.
When was the case filed?
Ramage v. Ryan was filed on 11/24/1992. It was terminated on 11/16/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9455316 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:92-cv-00797 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).