Reiss v. Audible Inc

Court

District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Jennifer L. Rochon · 459 cases in index

Docket number

1:24-cv-05923

Cause

15:2 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

08/05/2024

2,254 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Reiss · 107 cases
• defendant · Audible, Inc · 27 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 28 Antitrust cases in our index naming Audible, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Reiss v. Audible Inc?

Reiss v. Audible Inc is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 08/05/2024 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:24-cv-05923.

When was the case filed?

Reiss v. Audible Inc was filed on 08/05/2024. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).