Rickert v. Urs Washington Group

Court

District Court, S.D. Illinois (S.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Michael J. Reagan · 2,161 cases in index

Docket number

3:16-cv-01388

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

790 Labor: Other
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

Defendant

Date filed

12/22/2016

Date terminated

07/18/2017

2,750 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Rickert · 56 cases
• defendant · Urs Washington Group

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming URS Washington Group — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rickert v. Urs Washington Group?

Rickert v. Urs Washington Group is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/22/2016 in the District Court, S.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 07/18/2017. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Illinois, docket number 3:16-cv-01388.

When was the case filed?

Rickert v. Urs Washington Group was filed on 12/22/2016. It was terminated on 07/18/2017.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.