Rinehart v. Gmac
Rinehart v. Gmac is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/03/1995 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 03/25/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Tena Campbell · 2,840 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:95-cv-01002
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 11/03/1995
- Date terminated
- 03/25/1996
2,827 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rinehart v. Gmac?
Rinehart v. Gmac is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 11/03/1995 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 03/25/1996. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:95-cv-01002.
When was the case filed?
Rinehart v. Gmac was filed on 11/03/1995. It was terminated on 03/25/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10269015 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:95-cv-01002 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).