Rolf v. Usm
Rolf v. Usm is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/09/1989 in the District Court, S.D. California. The case was terminated on 03/22/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. California (S.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- J. Lawrence Irving · 373 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:89-cv-01703
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 11/09/1989
- Date terminated
- 03/22/1990
1,596 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rolf v. Usm?
Rolf v. Usm is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 11/09/1989 in the District Court, S.D. California. The case was terminated on 03/22/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. California, docket number 3:89-cv-01703.
When was the case filed?
Rolf v. Usm was filed on 11/09/1989. It was terminated on 03/22/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9074967 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:89-cv-01703 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).