Rubio v. Twinlab
Rubio v. Twinlab is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/29/2008 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 05/22/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Clark Waddoups · 1,100 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:08-cv-00565
- Nature of suit
- 790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/29/2008
- Date terminated
- 05/22/2009
2,528 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rubio v. Twinlab?
Rubio v. Twinlab is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/29/2008 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 05/22/2009. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:08-cv-00565.
When was the case filed?
Rubio v. Twinlab was filed on 07/29/2008. It was terminated on 05/22/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12426103 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:08-cv-00565 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).