Ruby v. Dolgencorp., Inc
Ruby v. Dolgencorp., Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/14/2006 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 12/04/2007.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/14/2006
- Date terminated
- 12/04/2007
22,485 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Ruby · 87 cases
- defendant · Dolgencorp, Inc. · 3625 cases
Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern
This is one of 3,626 Labor cases in our index naming DOLGENCORP, INC. — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ruby v. Dolgencorp., Inc?
Ruby v. Dolgencorp., Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/14/2006 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 12/04/2007. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida.
When was the case filed?
Ruby v. Dolgencorp., Inc was filed on 07/14/2006. It was terminated on 12/04/2007.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 17998664).