Ruddy v. Black
Ruddy v. Black is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/13/1990 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/03/1993.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Thomas C. Platt · 4,059 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:90-cv-01282
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 04/13/1990
- Date terminated
- 11/03/1993
3,456 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ruddy v. Black?
Ruddy v. Black is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/13/1990 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 11/03/1993. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 9:90-cv-01282.
When was the case filed?
Ruddy v. Black was filed on 04/13/1990. It was terminated on 11/03/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9730265 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:90-cv-01282 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).