Rudolph v. Ross
Rudolph v. Ross is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/28/2013 in the District Court, S.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 07/30/2013.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Indiana (S.D. Ind.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William T. Lawrence · 2,620 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:13-cv-00866
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 05/28/2013
- Date terminated
- 07/30/2013
998 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rudolph v. Ross?
Rudolph v. Ross is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/28/2013 in the District Court, S.D. Indiana. The case was terminated on 07/30/2013. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Indiana, docket number 1:13-cv-00866.
When was the case filed?
Rudolph v. Ross was filed on 05/28/2013. It was terminated on 07/30/2013.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13009638 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:13-cv-00866 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).