Ruff v. Isaac
Ruff v. Isaac is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/14/2000 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 11/22/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George Caram Steeh · 2,465 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:00-cv-72667
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 06/14/2000
- Date terminated
- 11/22/2000
8,348 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ruff v. Isaac?
Ruff v. Isaac is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/14/2000 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 11/22/2000. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:00-cv-72667.
When was the case filed?
Ruff v. Isaac was filed on 06/14/2000. It was terminated on 11/22/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11211710 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:00-cv-72667 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).