Ruffin v. Citifinancial
Ruffin v. Citifinancial is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/02/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 07/18/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. Alabama (S.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/02/2003
- Date terminated
- 07/18/2003
958 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Ruffin · 321 cases
- defendant · Citifinancial · 61 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ruffin v. Citifinancial?
Ruffin v. Citifinancial is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/02/2003 in the District Court, S.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 07/18/2003. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. Alabama.
When was the case filed?
Ruffin v. Citifinancial was filed on 04/02/2003. It was terminated on 07/18/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62768397 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).