Russell v. Wells
Russell v. Wells is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/16/2003 in the District Court, E.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 01/06/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Washington (E.D. Wash.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Alan A. McDonald · 867 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:03-cv-00479
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 12/16/2003
- Date terminated
- 01/06/2004
221 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Russell v. Wells?
Russell v. Wells is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/16/2003 in the District Court, E.D. Washington. The case was terminated on 01/06/2004. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Washington, docket number 2:03-cv-00479.
When was the case filed?
Russell v. Wells was filed on 12/16/2003. It was terminated on 01/06/2004.
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11859916 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:03-cv-00479 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).