Rydell v. Dfp Planning
Rydell v. Dfp Planning is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 03/26/1996 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 09/17/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael J. Davis · 14,282 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:96-cv-00280
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/26/1996
- Date terminated
- 09/17/1996
966 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Rydell · 13 cases
- defendant · Dfp Planning
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rydell v. Dfp Planning?
Rydell v. Dfp Planning is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 03/26/1996 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 09/17/1996. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 3:96-cv-00280.
When was the case filed?
Rydell v. Dfp Planning was filed on 03/26/1996. It was terminated on 09/17/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13697895 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:96-cv-00280 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).