Saville v. Dayton
Saville v. Dayton is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/29/2013 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 08/01/2013.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Michael J. Davis · 14,282 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:13-cv-01281
- Cause
- 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
28 U.S.C. § 2201 — Declaratory judgment - Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Challenges to the constitutionality of a state statute. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 05/29/2013
- Date terminated
- 08/01/2013
505 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Saville v. Dayton?
Saville v. Dayton is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 05/29/2013 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case was terminated on 08/01/2013. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:13-cv-01281.
When was the case filed?
Saville v. Dayton was filed on 05/29/2013. It was terminated on 08/01/2013.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 2201 — Declaratory judgment.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 7397345 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:13-cv-01281 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).