Savithri v. Xilinx Inc

Court

District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Karen Gren Scholer · 798 cases in index

Docket number

3:17-cv-01609

Cause

28:451 Employment Discrimination
28 U.S.C. § 451

Nature of suit

751 Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Claims over medical or family leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

06/19/2017

Date terminated

05/07/2018

7,906 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Savithri
• defendant · Xilinx, Inc · 40 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 41 Labor cases in our index naming Xilinx, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• John v. Xilinx, Inc
  District Court, E.D. TexasFiled 10/17/2005

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Savithri v. Xilinx Inc?

Savithri v. Xilinx Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 06/19/2017 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 05/07/2018. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 3:17-cv-01609.

When was the case filed?

Savithri v. Xilinx Inc was filed on 06/19/2017. It was terminated on 05/07/2018.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 451.