Schmidt v. Bdo Seidman, LLP
Schmidt v. Bdo Seidman, LLP is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 02/22/2008 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 02/10/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David Alan Ezra · 2,518 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:08-cv-00084
- Cause
- 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 02/22/2008
- Date terminated
- 02/10/2009
4,294 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Schmidt · 1414 cases
- defendant · Bdo Seidman LLP · 31 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
BDO Seidman LLP is named in 31 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Contract cases naming the same defendant:
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Schmidt v. Bdo Seidman, LLP?
Schmidt v. Bdo Seidman, LLP is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 02/22/2008 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 02/10/2009. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii, docket number 1:08-cv-00084.
When was the case filed?
Schmidt v. Bdo Seidman, LLP was filed on 02/22/2008. It was terminated on 02/10/2009.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 6301125 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:08-cv-00084 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).