Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuit

Sealed One v. Sealed One

Forfeiture / Penalty Terminated 01/21/1992 District Court, D. Nebraska

Sealed One v. Sealed One is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 09/12/1991 in the District Court, D. Nebraska. The case was terminated on 01/21/1992.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Nebraska (D. Neb.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
625 Drug related seizure of property
Government forfeiture of property connected to alleged drug activity.
Jurisdiction
Government plaintiff
Date filed
09/12/1991
Date terminated
01/21/1992

26 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits

Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sealed One v. Sealed One?

Sealed One v. Sealed One is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 09/12/1991 in the District Court, D. Nebraska. The case was terminated on 01/21/1992. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Nebraska.

When was the case filed?

Sealed One v. Sealed One was filed on 09/12/1991. It was terminated on 01/21/1992.

Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17550953 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).