Seamon v. Pera
Seamon v. Pera is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/23/1991 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 08/24/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. New York (E.D.N.Y)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Arthur D. Spatt · 6,791 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:91-cv-03710
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 09/23/1991
- Date terminated
- 08/24/1992
3,457 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Seamon v. Pera?
Seamon v. Pera is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/23/1991 in the District Court, E.D. New York. The case was terminated on 08/24/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. New York, docket number 9:91-cv-03710.
When was the case filed?
Seamon v. Pera was filed on 09/23/1991. It was terminated on 08/24/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9306454 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:91-cv-03710 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).