Seitz v. Bochynski
Seitz v. Bochynski is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 02/02/2004 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 10/08/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Tennessee (M.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William J. Haynes, Jr · 2,132 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:04-cv-00097
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/02/2004
- Date terminated
- 10/08/2004
1,073 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Seitz v. Bochynski?
Seitz v. Bochynski is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 02/02/2004 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 10/08/2004. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee, docket number 3:04-cv-00097.
When was the case filed?
Seitz v. Bochynski was filed on 02/02/2004. It was terminated on 10/08/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17876044 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:04-cv-00097 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).