Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Patent Lawsuit

Selfridge v. Hill Etal

Patent Terminated 10/19/1987 District Court, D. Arizona

Selfridge v. Hill Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/23/1985 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 10/19/1987.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
12/23/1985
Date terminated
10/19/1987

827 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Selfridge v. Hill Etal?

Selfridge v. Hill Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/23/1985 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 10/19/1987. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona.

When was the case filed?

Selfridge v. Hill Etal was filed on 12/23/1985. It was terminated on 10/19/1987.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Patent Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8668709 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).