Sethi v. Singh
Sethi v. Singh is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/29/2009 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 06/01/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Inge P Johnson · 4,891 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:09-cv-01062
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/29/2009
- Date terminated
- 06/01/2009
1,665 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sethi v. Singh?
Sethi v. Singh is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 05/29/2009 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case was terminated on 06/01/2009. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 5:09-cv-01062.
When was the case filed?
Sethi v. Singh was filed on 05/29/2009. It was terminated on 06/01/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12427784 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:09-cv-01062 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).