Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Antitrust Lawsuit

Shames v. Expedia, Inc

Antitrust Terminated 01/04/2013 District Court, N.D. California

Shames v. Expedia, Inc is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 10/22/2012 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 01/04/2013.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, N.D. California (N.D. Cal.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Jeffrey S. White · 2,711 cases in index
Docket number
3:12-cv-05444
Cause
15:1 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act
Nature of suit
410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury demand
Plaintiff
Date filed
10/22/2012
Date terminated
01/04/2013

2,121 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

Other Cases Naming This Defendant

Expedia Inc is named in 111 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Antitrust cases naming the same defendant:

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shames v. Expedia, Inc?

Shames v. Expedia, Inc is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 10/22/2012 in the District Court, N.D. California. The case was terminated on 01/04/2013. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. California, docket number 3:12-cv-05444.

When was the case filed?

Shames v. Expedia, Inc was filed on 10/22/2012. It was terminated on 01/04/2013.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Antitrust Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4494947 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:12-cv-05444 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).