Sharp v. Heatley
Sharp v. Heatley is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/21/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 04/26/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stewart Dalzell · 3,851 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-04395
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/21/1998
- Date terminated
- 04/26/2002
4,095 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sharp v. Heatley?
Sharp v. Heatley is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/21/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 04/26/2002. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:98-cv-04395.
When was the case filed?
Sharp v. Heatley was filed on 08/21/1998. It was terminated on 04/26/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10747395 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-04395 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).