Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Real Property Lawsuit

Shepherd v. Carter Etal

Real Property Terminated 05/16/1990 District Court, D. Kansas

Shepherd v. Carter Etal is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 11/14/1988 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/16/1990.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Kansas (D. Kan.)
Official Court Website →
Docket number
Nature of suit
220 Foreclosure
Actions to foreclose on a mortgage or other lien against real property.
Jurisdiction
Government defendant
Date filed
11/14/1988
Date terminated
05/16/1990

1,660 Real Property cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Real Property Lawsuits

Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shepherd v. Carter Etal?

Shepherd v. Carter Etal is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 11/14/1988 in the District Court, D. Kansas. The case was terminated on 05/16/1990. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Real Property” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Kansas.

When was the case filed?

Shepherd v. Carter Etal was filed on 11/14/1988. It was terminated on 05/16/1990.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Real Property Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9085490 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).